|
|
No Evidence of Vick's Crimes on Wikipedia, Should Charges be Dropped?
Vick's attorneys say "yea"
 Atlanta, GA - I'm going to begin this article with a secret. When lazy reporters like your's truly gather knowledge on an issue, we go to the repository of all wisdom, wikipedia. So when I went online to locate evidence about the updates in the dogfighting case of Mike Vick, I could not find anything relating Mike Vick and dogfighting on his wikipedia page. That's right, in response to the remainder of the Bad Newz Kennelz operating team totally going against rule #1 and snitching on Ron Mexico himself, Vick's elite attorney team was forced to use drastic measures.  thesmokinggun.com broke the news that the changes on wikipedia came from the attorney's office. Vick's lawyers had no comment on the digital defense, other than to point to wikipedia as an example of how people are ignoring the truth in the Vick case. Head lawyer James Smith wrote, in a letter to the New York Times, "If there is no evidence on wikipedia, how can there be evidence of Vick's crimes? The prosecution has no case, and Mike really needs to get back to work because he has a new coach." The innovative strategy has given the team of Federal Attorneys pause, because, as Fox News Legal Analyst Krusty the Clown said, "I don't know about you, but I trust wikipedia more than any gang of snitching dogfighter scum. If there's no evidence on wikipedia, we must help Mike Vick as the media!"
|